Double bookings
A guest books on Booking, your daughter books someone else directly. Crisis.
One dashboard where all your rental channels come together — caravans, boats, holiday homes, vehicles. Live calendar, automatic invoices, contracts in one click. No more double reservations, no manual retyping.
// the problem
Excel for planning, WhatsApp for customer contact, a hacked booking plugin on the site, a separate invoicing tool, and a 'Contracts 2026' folder on Google Drive. It works — until it doesn't.
A guest books on Booking, your daughter books someone else directly. Crisis.
Booking → invoice → contract → calendar → bookkeeping. Four times the same data.
Who paid? Which deposit needs to go back? What's empty next weekend? No idea.
quick maths
Slide the two bars to your situation. The number on the right is what you spend per month on things an integrated system does for you — and how quickly a typical build pays itself back.
saved per month
saved per year
until a build of € 8.000 is paid back
Indicative — your real situation sets the number. The build (€ 8.000) is a guide price for a rental booking system; we'll make it concrete in the first call.
// the solution
I build a rental platform that fits your process exactly — not the other way around. Including the hooks to the places you already get bookings from.
Every booking, whether it comes from Airbnb, Booking, your website or the phone, visible in one calendar. Channel-manager hooks block overlap automatically — double reservations become technically impossible.
Guest books → invoice and contract are generated, emailed and dropped into your bookkeeping. NL and ES templates, right language per guest.
Stripe or Mollie link for deposit, final payment and automatic deposit return after inspection.
// when SaaS stops fitting
Tommy, Booqable, Avantio and Icnea are fine — for what they are. Here's where they break for rental operators working in two countries or with their own workflow.
Point-of-sale software that does rentals on the side.
breekt op:
No multilingual customer portal, no native NL bookkeeping link built in.
Generic rental SaaS, one template.
breekt op:
Works for 1 product type. Breaks the moment you combine different object types or locations.
Enterprise holiday rentals, from 20 units up.
breekt op:
€280+/mo, Spanish-first, no NL interface. Too heavy for 5–15 properties.
Per-property model for the Spanish market.
breekt op:
Your brand disappears. Customer sees Icnea, not you. No own-domain checkout.
Custom where SaaS stops — fixed monthly fee from €395/mo, everything included.
// how it goes
Four weeks from first call to your first real booking flowing fully automatically — channel sync, invoice, contract, customer email.
// step 01
Half an hour. Which channels do you run now (Airbnb, Booking, your own site, Vrbo)? Which accounting (Holded, e-Boekhouden, Moneybird)? How many units, how many double bookings per month? No pitch.
// step 02
Rental panel on a fixed monthly fee (€895/mo). Right in the same call we decide which channels to connect, which accounting, which payment flow (Stripe or Mollie, deposit authorisation or not).
// step 03
I build your dashboard, connect your channels, set up your invoicing (BTW + IVA, NL + ES). Weekly update in your portal: what's live, which channel is connected, which test bookings work.
// step 04
First real booking flows automatically through all systems. From here a monthly report (uptime, revenue, occupancy) and ongoing build inside the price — add a channel, a second location, another product type.
Before I worked with Webstability I had three double bookings a month. Since launch in 2024 — literally zero. And I save at least half a day a week on admin.
// what it costs, how long it takes
Fixed price upfront, four weeks to launch, ongoing maintenance after. No quotes, no extra-hours arguments.
1–8 units · single location · standard channels
8–20 units · NL+ES customer base · contracts & deposits
20+ units · multi-location · custom bookkeeping link
// let's talk
A no-strings 30-minute call. I'll honestly look with you whether it makes sense, and if so, the shortest route to working software.